GLUECKKANJA AG
GLUECKKANJA-AG
Registry
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 14 |
| All fragments | 19 blocks across 3 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 206258382 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | Registry record |
| Shared handles | clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
4 weekly snapshots · JSON
14
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 14
2026-07-13
IP Ranges (14)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 193.98.39.0/24 | GLUECKKANJA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:1a:90e8::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:1a:b411::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3b:1b64::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:4b:4658::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:6b:44cd::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3070:3026::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3071:2596::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:1166::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:15a7::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:25d4::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:2aad::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:30e7::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3081:3050::/64 | GLUECKKANJA-AG | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “GLUECKKANJA” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- GLUECKKANJA-GAB-AG 3 blocks
- GLUECKKANJA-OFFENBACH-NET 2 blocks
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B
how networks compare →
92.9%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(13 of 14)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
HOS-GUN
UUNETDE-I