Foilhat

Registry
Cluster stats
Netblocks7
All fragments 8 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID206070000
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution Registry record
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
185.1.215.16/32 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
193.110.12.150/32 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
193.110.13.150/32 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:21:9::150/128 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:21:10::150/128 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:117::2:1485:1/128 Foilhat PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2a0a:3500::/32 FOILHAT-SE RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Foilhat” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: F how networks compare →
14.3% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (1 of 7)
Possible discrepancies (1)

These blocks are registered to Foilhat but cryptographically authorized for a different, unrelated network (1 distinct holder) — often M&A history, multi-homing, or outsourced/managed hosting, occasionally worth a closer look.

2a0a:3500::/32 /32 authorized for AS21485 — IP Excess AB

NIC Handles

AS21485 DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MNT-FOILHAT