eth0 AS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks13
All fragments 14 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID206015745
RegistryBGP
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 10 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
13 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 13 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (13)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
44.30.56.0/24 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
44.32.207.0/24 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2001:67c:d38::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2001:67c:d38::/48 eth0 AS RIPE ASSIGNED PI ● high
2a0a:cd83::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0a:cd83::/32 eth0 AS RIPE ALLOCATED-BY-LIR ● high
2a0a:cd83:1::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0a:cd83:4::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0a:cd83:5::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0a:cd83:1000::/40 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0a:cd83:1300::/40 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0b:4e07:43::/48 eth0 AS RIPE ASSIGNED ● high
2a0b:4e07:43::/48 eth0 AS BGP ANNOUNCED ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “eth0” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
84.6% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (11 of 13)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS216091 AS56655-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE ETH0-MNT ETH0-MNT HOP179-MNT HOP179-MNT ORG-EA1728-RIPE RIPE-NCC-END-MNT