TNSE CUST IF IT SERVICES AS

TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
All fragments 43 blocks across 10 clusters
Cluster ID205724121
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
213.115.1.184/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.1.188/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.9.4/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.79.24/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-SERVICES-AS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.114.176/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-SERVICES-AS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.133.176/29 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.142.192/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-SERVICES-AS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.200.0/29 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-SERVICES-AS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.205.104/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-Services RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.115.253.80/30 TNSE-CUST-IF-IT-SERVICES-AS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “TNSE CUST IF” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 10 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE TNSE-MNT