SACMI

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks13
All fragments 45 blocks across 30 clusters
Cluster ID205577709
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
13 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 13 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (13)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
77.252.112.64/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.0/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.8/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.16/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.24/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.32/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.40/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.48/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.56/29 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.64/28 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.80/28 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.96/28 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.209.201.112/28 SACMI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “SACMI” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 30 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (13 of 13)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CASAWEB-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE NETIA-MNT