Teleport sp. z o.o.

TELEPORT-Network
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 11 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID205524793
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
46.175.112.0/22 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
46.175.116.0/22 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.209.38.0/23 Teleport-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
91.217.18.0/24 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
91.217.19.0/24 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.225.108.0/23 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.225.110.0/23 TELEPORT-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.35.24.0/25 Teleport-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.35.24.128/25 Teleport-Network RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “TELEPORT Network” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
77.8% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MNT-TELEPORT