FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 11 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID205275770
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
2.239.212.168/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
37.186.216.128/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.223.195.72/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.39.66.216/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.39.115.200/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.42.113.240/29 FASTWEB-S_S_GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.57.4.184/29 FASTWEB-S_S RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.57.6.32/29 FASTWEB-S_S RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FASTWEB S S” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE FASTWEB-MNT