EAPA
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 18 |
| All fragments | 21 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 205272087 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
4 weekly snapshots · JSON
18
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 18
2026-07-13
IP Ranges (18)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.16.237.48/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 85.20.209.48/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 85.20.244.208/30 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 85.20.244.212/30 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 89.118.111.216/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 89.118.247.8/30 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 89.118.249.112/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 89.119.243.4/30 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.213.92.8/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.213.92.16/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.58.212.180/30 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.59.208.32/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.222.59.40/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.222.118.176/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.223.46.224/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.223.125.56/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.223.230.192/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.223.230.248/29 | EAPA | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “EAPA” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- IDEAPARKOULU-160317 via DNA Oyj sub-allocation
- K-GIA9-AREAPANIGHINA-REXSITTITALIASRL via Retelit Digital Services S.p.A. sub-allocation
- CENTROINTERNAZIONALESTUDIARCHITETTURAANDREAPALLADIO sub-allocation
- GOWIRELESSEAPA via NOS COMUNICACOES, S.A. sub-allocation
- STUDIOLEGALEASSOCIATOGIUDICEANDREAPARTNER sub-allocation
- BONNEAPARTIM-HWY-AT via A1 Telekom Austria AG sub-allocation
- ANDREAPATIERNODOTTORECOMMERCIALISTA sub-allocation
- Creapaysage via Orange S.A. sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C
how networks compare →
50.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(9 of 18)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
BTI-MNT
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
INTERB-MNT
TIG-MNT