PIT Chile - Transit

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks16
All fragments 20 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID205237495
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 9 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 4 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (16)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
45.68.16.3/32 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
45.68.16.4/32 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
45.68.44.3/32 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
198.32.242.240/32 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
200.23.206.3/32 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
201.149.98.14/32 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
206.41.108.104/32 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:504:0:6::1240/128 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:504:0:11:0:6:4112:1/128 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:504:40:108::1:104/128 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2801:14:9000::2:2850:1/128 PIT US PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2801:14:9000::6:4112:1/128 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2803:3440:9025::6:4112:1/128 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2803:7450:ba::6:4112:1/128 PIT Chile - Transit PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
125.215.239.80/29 PIT-HK APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
185.109.252.128/29 PIT-NTW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
56.2% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 16)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS22850 AS64112 BNA2-AP COMTEL-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MAINT-HK-PCCW-BIA-CS TA66-AP ro-phoenix-1-mnt