FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks5
All fragments 6 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID205032211
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (5)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
2.229.46.240/29 FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
37.186.213.128/27 FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.208.56.168/30 FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.47.205.192/26 FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
151.0.143.96/29 FASTWEB-CASA_DI_CURA_ABANO_TERME_POLISPECIALISTICA_E_TERMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FASTWEB CASA DI CURA ABANO TERME POLISPECIALISTICA E” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (5 of 5)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE FASTWEB-MNT