VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 18 blocks across 5 clusters
Cluster ID205011390
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
87.213.32.208/30 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.32.212/30 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.32.252/30 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.34.112/30 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.36.72/29 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.37.136/29 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.38.112/29 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.213.39.128/29 VERSATEL-CUST-Stichting-Serviceverlening-Berg-Bosch RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “VERSATEL CUST Stichting” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE VERSANIS-MNT