Etihad Salam Telecom CJSC

Al-Faleh-Sports-House
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks17
All fragments 18 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID204815482
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
17 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 17 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (17)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
82.167.145.232/30 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.167.147.232/30 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.167.153.80/28 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.85/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.90/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.93/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.94/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.98/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.106/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.108/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.110/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.112/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.113/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.114/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.121/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.123/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.101.147.125/32 Al-Faleh-Sports-House RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Al Faleh” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (17 of 17)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE ITC-NOC-MNT ORBITNET-MNT