Celeste SAS

PCW-CUST-CPTL-TOURDUVALAT

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	3
All fragments	35 blocks across 18 clusters
Cluster ID	204800093
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (3)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
195.200.169.96/28	PCW-CUST-CPTL-TOURDUVALAT	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
195.200.189.24/30	PCW-CUST-CPTL-TOURDUVALAT	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
195.200.189.64/30	PCW-CUST-CPTL-TOURDUVALAT	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “PCW CUST CPTL” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Combined view of all 18 name-family clusters →

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

PCW-CUST-CPTL-HARMONIE via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-CORNELIUS via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-BERTLING via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-AKG via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-KNAUF via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-BOTTCHER via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-PERI via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
PCW-CUST-CPTL-NIC-ADO via Celeste SAS sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (3 of 3)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS8310-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE