CG09

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks12
All fragments 14 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID204549563
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
12 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 12 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (12)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
86.65.167.112/28 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.31.0/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.51.0/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.57.120/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.57.128/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.57.136/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.57.144/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.57.232/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.208.64/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.208.72/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.208.80/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.208.200/29 CG09 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CG09” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (12 of 12)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE LDCOM-MNT LDCOM-PRO-MNT