VTO-CUST-SMT-HYBRID
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 1 |
| All fragments | 2 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 204402105 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (1)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.19.216.152/29 | VTO-CUST-SMT-HYBRID | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● medium |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “VTO CUST SMT” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- VTO-CUST-SMT-SOZIAL 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- Gc Net 0258 via GlobalConnect A/S sub-allocation
- MELBOURNE-CUST-SMAT sub-allocation
- Net Cust 89 via Web4U s.r.o. sub-allocation
- MELBOURNE-CUST-CASU sub-allocation
- Gc Net 0259 via GlobalConnect A/S sub-allocation
- Nat Range sub-allocation
- VTO-CUST-NEXUS via 1&1 Versatel GmbH sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(1 of 1)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
VT-MNT