RB C+C
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 6 |
| All fragments | 13 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 193383247 |
| Registry | PEERINGDB |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
2 weekly snapshots · JSON
6
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 6
2026-07-06
IP Ranges (6)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.81.193.101/32 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.102.136/32 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 193.189.82.198/32 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8::8896:0:1/128 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:33::a103:4966:1/128 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:bd::3:4966:1/128 | RB C+C | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B
how networks compare →
83.3%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(5 of 6)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
AS34966