PW-NET
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 6 |
| All fragments | 7 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 191803552 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | unresolved |
| Shared handles | clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (6)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.177.125.64/26 | PW-NET | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 88.220.166.192/29 | PW-NET | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 88.220.166.200/29 | PW-NET | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 194.165.150.232 – 194.165.150.243 | PW | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 194.173.73.0/24 | PW-NET | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 2a14:67c2:8fd::/48 | PW | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B
how networks compare →
83.3%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(5 of 6)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
GO-JOR
MNT-EXATEL
TIANJIN-JIANRONGWANGLUO-MNT
UUNETDE-I