FALIX
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 8 |
| Cluster ID | 191760471 |
| Registry | BGP |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | unresolved |
| Shared handles | clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
2 weekly snapshots · JSON
8
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 8
2026-07-06
IP Ranges (8)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.47.222.0/24 | FALIX | BGP | ANNOUNCED | ● high |
| 185.1.138.33/32 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.155.190/32 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.166.57/32 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:f2:e1:a5:20:9018:1/128 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2a0c:b641:700:0:a5:20:9018:1/128 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2a0c:b641:701:0:a5:20:9018:1/128 | FALIX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2a0c:b641:c00::/48 | FALIX | BGP | ANNOUNCED | ● high |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C
how networks compare →
62.5%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(5 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
AS209018
AS209018
BPAK-MNT
netutils-mnt