Xin Shi Ji Wang Ba

XinShiJiWangBa
Registry
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 10 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210136677
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution Registry record
Shared handles clustered on 10 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
59.33.251.124/30 xinshijiwangba APNIC Allocated non-portable ● low
59.44.141.4/30 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
59.44.143.56/30 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
59.44.155.128/30 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
59.44.176.33 – 59.44.176.34 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
59.45.142.149/32 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
59.45.210.130/32 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
61.143.138.64/30 xinshijiwangba APNIC Allocated non-portable ● low
218.108.67.200/30 XinShiJiWangBa APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “XinShiJiWangBa” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
33.3% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (3 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CC1699-AP CC1699-AP CZ-AP HZ-AP IC83-AP MAINT-CHINANET-GD MAINT-CHINANET-LN MAINT-CN-HZCNC XW49-AP XW49-AP