UTINET
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 20 |
| Cluster ID | 193094690 |
| Registry | APNIC |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | unresolved |
| Shared handles | clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (20)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 124.30.62.120/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.85.236 – 124.30.85.247 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.110.120/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.118.100/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.131.168 – 124.30.131.179 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.131.224/28 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.156.176/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.181.24 – 124.30.181.35 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.198.176/29 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.200.144 – 124.30.200.155 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.218.16/29 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 124.30.239.0/29 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 210.18.46.168 – 210.18.46.183 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.16.40/29 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.16.64/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.16.125 – 221.134.16.126 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.81.84/30 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.81.96 – 221.134.81.115 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.81.128 – 221.134.81.239 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 221.134.99.224/28 | UTINET | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C
how networks compare →
70.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(14 of 20)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
HS51-AP
HS51-AP
MAINT-IN-IRINN
MAINT-IN-SATYAM
MAINT-IN-SIFY