TIANBAO-LTD-TJ

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
Cluster ID210141833
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
60.28.55.184/29 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.29.31.96/29 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.29.46.64/28 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.29.46.80/28 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.29.46.152/29 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.29.174.24/30 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
60.30.246.160/29 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.69.27.28/30 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.69.96.56/30 TIANBAO-LTD-TJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AC2798-AP HZ19-AP HZ19-AP MAINT-CNCGROUP-TJ