SIEL

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
Registered in Italy (4) · SI (2)
All fragments 88 blocks across 7 clusters
Cluster ID208876429
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 9 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 5 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.149.168.160/28 Siel_Spa_Net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● high
91.220.194.17/32 SIEL PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
91.220.194.117/32 SIEL PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
209.227.213.128/28 Siel_Spa_Net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● high
2001:7f8:46::5:1790/128 SIEL PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:46:0:1:0:5:1790/128 SIEL PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
80.247.77.98/32 Siel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.141.16.216/29 SIEL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2a02:1b8:10:101::/64 SIEL-NET RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “SIEL” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARUBA-MNT AS51790 DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE INTERB-MNT LEVELIP-MNT NESSUS-AT-MNT SSAH24-RIPE SSAH41-RIPE