shenjiju

Registry
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 10 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID211859731
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution Registry record
Shared handles clustered on 13 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
59.44.204.150/32 ShenJiJu APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
202.97.156.228/30 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
202.99.218.196 – 202.99.218.203 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.26.56.210/32 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.26.57.146/32 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.26.190.180/32 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.26.190.180/30 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.26.191.160/30 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.108.45.160/29 shenjiju APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “shenjiju” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CC1699-AP CC1699-AP MAINT-CHINANET-LN MAINT-CN-HZCNC MAINT-CNCGROUP-SX SZ572-AP SZ572-AP XW49-AP XW49-AP YC1161-AP YC1161-AP YX454-AP +1 more