scandent-chn
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 6 |
| Cluster ID | 210299599 |
| Registry | APNIC |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
5 weekly snapshots · JSON
6
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 6
2026-07-19
IP Ranges (6)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.246.246.48/28 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 125.17.109.64/30 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 203.101.64.96/27 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 203.145.133.84/30 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 203.145.133.192/26 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
| 203.145.182.152/29 | scandent-chn | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(6 of 6)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
MAINT-IN-BBIL
NA40-AP
NA40-AP