RO_ON_internet

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9 · 8,183 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 11 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID211039271
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
205.188.16.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.44.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.110.0/23 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.160.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.168.0/23 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.176.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.196.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.232.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
205.188.244.0/22 RO_ON_internet RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “RO ON” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
44.4% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (4 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE mnt-lt-code200-1