Pivit
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 7 · 3,578 IPv4 addresses |
| Cluster ID | 210148445 |
| Registry | APNIC |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 8 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (7)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123.100.128.0/24 | Pivit | BGP | ANNOUNCED | ● high |
| 123.100.132.0/24 | Pivit | BGP | ANNOUNCED | ● high |
| 123.100.142.0/24 | Pivit | APNIC | ALLOCATED PORTABLE | ● medium |
| 123.100.153.0/24 | Pivit | APNIC | ALLOCATED PORTABLE | ● medium |
| 123.100.154.0/23 | Pivit | APNIC | ALLOCATED PORTABLE | ● medium |
| 123.100.128.0/21 | Pivit | APNIC | ALLOCATED PORTABLE | ● low |
| 2401:c780::/32 | Pivit | APNIC | ALLOCATED PORTABLE | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- VITEBSK-RCPIVITEBSK via Republican Unitary Telecommunication Enterprise Beltelecom sub-allocation
- Apivita Plyus Brest via Republican Unitary Telecommunication Enterprise Beltelecom sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B
how networks compare →
85.7%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(6 of 7)
Possible discrepancies (1)
These blocks are registered to Pivit but cryptographically authorized for a different, unrelated network (1 distinct holder) — often M&A history, multi-homing, or outsourced/managed hosting, occasionally worth a closer look.
| 123.100.128.0/21 /21 | authorized for AS135027 — Virtualplatform |
NIC Handles
AP710-AP
APNIC-HM
AS38289
CW788-AP
CW788-AP
JDM3-AP
MH1490-AP
ORG-PA50-AP