PENTLAND-GROUP

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
Registered in United Kingdom (6) · Germany (1)
All fragments 16 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID208912745
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.7.175.192/27 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.245.207.184/29 PENTLAND-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.175.218.112/29 PENTLAND RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.175.230.88/29 PENTLAND RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.144.224.96/27 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.188.163.160/27 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.204.11.128/27 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2a00:2381:f142::/48 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE AGGREGATED-BY-LIR ● low
2a00:2381:f142::/56 PENTLAND-GROUP RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “PENTLAND” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
66.7% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

BTNET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EASYNET-UK-MNT MNET-MNT NEWNET-MNT