MUW

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 11 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID210379324
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
31.172.189.128/26 MUW-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.80/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.164/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.172/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.228/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.232/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.236/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.240/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
77.252.217.244/30 MUW RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “MUW” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MNT-FIBERTECH NETIA-MNT