MLaB NL
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 22 |
| All fragments | 24 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 193387054 |
| Registry | PEERINGDB |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | unresolved |
| Shared handles | clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (22)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 185.0.30.51/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.32.53/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.94.22/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.138.17/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.147.149/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.160.161/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.170.47/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.184.7/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 185.1.222.151/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 193.189.82.238/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 193.239.117.30/32 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:13::a504:1047:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:33::a104:1047:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:8f::a504:1047:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:9e::a057:0:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:b6::a057:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:b7::a504:1047:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:ca:1::149/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:10f::a057:161/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:11c:1:0:4:1047:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:134::7/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2a0c:b641:700:0:a5:41:47:1/128 | MLaB NL | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C
how networks compare →
68.2%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(15 of 22)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
AS41047