Lush Sweden AB

LUSH

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	7
Registered in	Germany (3) · United Kingdom (1)
All fragments	17 blocks across 5 clusters
Cluster ID	209632291
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

3 weekly snapshots · JSON

7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05

2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-12

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
86.188.148.192/27	LUSH	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
92.79.101.232/29	LUSH-NET	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
92.79.119.168/29	LUSH-NET	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
145.253.140.112/29	LUSH-NET	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
2a00:2381:4e::/48	LUSH	RIPE	AGGREGATED-BY-LIR	● low
2a00:2381:4e::/56	LUSH	RIPE	ASSIGNED	● low
2a00:2381:24dd::/48	LUSH-LIMITED	RIPE	AGGREGATED-BY-LIR	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “LUSH” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Lush Sweden AB 4 blocks
LUSH-HWY-AT 3 blocks
LUSH-BERLIN-NET 2 blocks
LUSH_MANUFAKTURA-HR 1 blocks

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

QINGDAO-ZHONGLUSHIKONG-Co via No.31,Jin-rong Street sub-allocation
GALUSHENKO sub-allocation
Jin Zhou Qu Bo Zhong Lu Shi Kong Wang Yuan via CHINANET Liaoning province Dalian MAN network sub-allocation
Moscow Butglushko sub-allocation
ALUSHIP-NETWORK via Netia SA sub-allocation
LUKOIL-INFORM-KALUSH sub-allocation
ASTRAL-SV-FO-BEBELUSH via Vodafone Romania S.A. sub-allocation
LUSHRETAIL-KCOM via Vercara, LLC sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 7)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARCOR-MNT BTNET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE