KIDUM

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 318 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 11 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID208864413
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 5 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
80.179.125.32/30 Kidum-Group-LTD RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.235.96/27 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.236.144/28 Kidum-Ltd RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.245.0/25 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.117.143.192/27 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.117.167.128/26 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.117.182.184/30 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.117.188.24 – 192.117.188.47 kidum RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.8.71.96/28 KIDUM RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.8.153.216/29 Kidum RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “KIDUM” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS5486-MNT AS9116-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE