GTJA

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks6
All fragments 14 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID210232341
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 16 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
6 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 6 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (6)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
101.231.185.16/28 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
101.231.185.48/28 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
123.124.211.96/27 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
180.168.15.128/25 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
180.168.46.144/30 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
210.72.229.24/30 GTJA APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “GTJA” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 6)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AC1591-AP BQ4-AP BQ4-AP FL715-AP FL715-AP HF337-AP HF337-AP HF615-AP HF615-AP KD213-AP KD213-AP MAINT-CHINANET-SH +4 more