GSXZGLJ

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 9 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID211910647
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 17 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
114.251.79.240/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.251.79.248/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.251.80.8/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.251.121.96/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.255.152.224/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.255.159.0/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.255.159.8/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
114.255.159.16/29 GSXZGLJ APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “GSXZGLJ” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
50.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (4 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

MAINT-CNCGROUP-BJ WZ1682-AP WZ1682-AP WZ1686-AP WZ1686-AP WZ1687-AP WZ1687-AP WZ1688-AP WZ1688-AP WZ1695-AP WZ1695-AP WZ1696-AP +5 more