Gemeente Almere

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 24 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210173700
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
82.148.218.172/30 GEMEENTE_ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.53.87.236/30 GEMEENTE_ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.145.207.232/30 GEMEENTE-ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.145.210.20/30 GEMEENTE-ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.145.210.212/30 GEMEENTE-ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.145.211.32/30 GEMEENTE_ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.145.235.12/30 GEMEENTE_ALMERE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2a07:3500:1090::/46 Gemeente Almere RIPE ALLOCATED-BY-LIR ● low
2a07:3500:1090::/48 Gemeente Almere RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Gemeente Almere” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
77.8% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EUROFIBER-MNT Eurofiber-MNT LOGIUS ORG-GA1108-RIPE