FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 19 blocks across 6 clusters
Cluster ID209613485
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 +1 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
90.80.242.69/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.83.250.156/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.85.120.21/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.115.124.175/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.51.96.152/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.250.116.109/32 FR-SAFE-COMPANY--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.101.29.60/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.234.148.225/32 FR-SAFE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FR SAFE” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PC80199-MNT RAIN-TRANSPAC