BURCHARDT EIENDOM AS

Endeavor Communications
GLEIF verified
LEI
549300OKCWLURTBRA810
Registered name
BURCHARDT EIENDOM AS
Jurisdiction
Ultimate parent
No parent on file in GLEIF
Cluster stats
Netblocks11 · 71,672 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 12 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID208821261
RegistryBGP
Owner jurisdictionNO
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution GLEIF legal-entity match
Legal identityLEI 549300OKCWLURTBRA810
Shared handles clustered on 7 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (11)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
64.18.140.0/22 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
75.103.128.0/18 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
75.103.192.0/19 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
137.49.224.0/19 Endeavor Communications ARIN DIRECT ALLOCATION ● high
137.49.224.0/19 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
172.96.132.0/22 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
206.53.139.67/32 Endeavor Communications PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
209.132.160.0/20 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2001:504:45:f3e8::67/128 Endeavor Communications PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2606:b500::/32 Endeavor Communications BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
75.103.128.0 – 75.103.223.255 Endeavor Communications ARIN DIRECT ALLOCATION ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Endeavor” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
72.7% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 11)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS19751 AS19751 CCCC NOC11721-ARIN NOC11721-ARIN NOC11721-ARIN NOC11721-ARIN