EMBOU

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 1,302 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 36 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID209259902
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.81.153.64/26 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.81.153.128/26 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.81.189.112/29 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.159.148.0/26 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.159.148.72/29 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.159.179.0/26 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.159.179.64/29 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.159.179.168/29 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.133.204.0/23 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.133.212.0/23 EMBOU RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “EMBOU” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
80.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MNT-EMBOU MNT-PROV-ONO