EANQ
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 6 |
| Cluster ID | 210144600 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
3 weekly snapshots · JSON
6
0 netblocks since 2026-07-12
2026-07-12
peak 6
2026-07-19
IP Ranges (6)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.6.178.40/30 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 85.20.188.168/29 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.255.5.152/30 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.255.5.168/30 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.255.5.176/29 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 213.255.16.32/27 | EANQ | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- Alix-Jeanquartier via T-Mobile Austria GmbH sub-allocation
- kaibiteanquan sub-allocation
- Keanqiche Ltd via TIANJIN Provincial Net of CT sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(6 of 6)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
BTI-MNT
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE