DFS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks7
Registered in China (3) · Italy (3) · Germany (1)
All fragments 90 blocks across 25 clusters
Cluster ID209149069
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 12 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
180.168.2.184/30 DFS APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
180.168.4.88/30 DFS APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
180.168.13.36/30 DFS APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
88.42.108.72/30 DFS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.84.44.40/30 DFS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.50.171.232/29 DFS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.66.104.176/29 DFS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “DFS” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 25 name-family clusters →

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
71.4% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (5 of 7)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARCOR-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE GJT2-AP GJT2-AP GJT3-AP GJT3-AP GJT4-AP GJT4-AP INTERB-MNT MAINT-CHINANET-SH PANSERVICE-NOC