cyberways GmbH
Cluster stats
Netblocks15
All fragments 24 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID191900100
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution unresolved
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

2 weekly snapshots · JSON
15 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 15 2026-07-06

IP Ranges (15)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
80.81.192.174/32 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
185.1.208.82/32 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
193.239.118.36/32 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
206.82.104.199/32 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:504:36::334c:0:1/128 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8::334c:0:1/128 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:13::a501:3132:1/128 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:44::334c:0:2/128 cyberways GmbH PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
212.125.96.0 – 212.125.98.255 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.100.0/24 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.102.0/24 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.105.0/27 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.110.0/27 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.111.128/25 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.125.112.0/23 CYBERWAYS-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
53.3% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 15)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS13132 CWAYS-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE