BUMA

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
Registered in Italy (6) · Poland (2) · Netherlands (1)
All fragments 18 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID208844454
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
78.5.69.12/32 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.5.73.164/32 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.5.75.136/30 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.6.153.32/29 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.6.155.148/30 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.7.167.200/30 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.21.193.160/29 BUMA-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.171.45.192/30 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.136.193.216/29 BUMA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “BUMA” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

BCI-MNT BTI-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE NETIA-MNT NLNET-MNT