AT-T-CZ

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 82 blocks across 21 clusters
Cluster ID209118193
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.77.78.160/30 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.77.90.11/32 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.85.179.176/29 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.85.234.240/29 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.86.84.128/25 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.179.218.0/29 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.213.207.84/30 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.39.53.252/30 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.39.104.208/28 AT-T-CZ RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “AT T” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 21 name-family clusters →

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE GTSCZ-MNT