AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
Registered in United Kingdom (3) · Netherlands (1)
All fragments 11 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID211009795
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
51.163.43.36/30 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE LEGACY ● low
51.163.43.40/30 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE LEGACY ● low
62.216.246.248/30 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.69.28.168/30 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2001:4d78:104:242::/64 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:204:55::/64 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2a09:da81:8010:23::/64 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2a09:da81:8010:24::/64 AMTRUST_MANAGEMENT RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “AMTRUST MANAGEMENT” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
75.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EQUINIX-FULFIL-MNT EQUINIX-MNT