AMIT

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 267 IPv4 addresses
Registered in Israel (6) · Italy (2) · Czechia (1) · India (1)
All fragments 61 blocks across 37 clusters
Cluster ID208819147
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 13 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 5 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
5.180.201.0/29 AMiT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
58.68.116.144/28 Amit_Enterprises APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
62.90.181.27/32 amit RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.219.248.200/30 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
82.80.17.128/25 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.194.160/27 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.217.8/29 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
192.116.238.128/26 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.210.63.64/29 AMIT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.222.216.224/29 AMIT-SRL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “AMIT” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 37 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
70.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS5486-MNT AS8551-MNT BYDZOVSKY DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE INTERB-MNT MAINT-IN-DWL MAINT-IN-IRINN NV-MNT-RIPE RM405-AP RM405-AP TIG-MNT +1 more