ADJD
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 9 |
| All fragments | 10 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 209093875 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 9
2026-07-19
IP Ranges (9)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 217.221.39.140/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.132.55/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.132.56/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.132.72/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.132.209/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.144.39/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.144.41/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.144.43/32 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
| 217.221.147.248/29 | ADJD | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “ADJD” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- adjd-EMIRNET 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- ADJD6 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD4 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD7 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD8 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD9 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD10 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD12 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
- ADJD13 via BT Italia S.p.A. sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
ALBACOM-MNT
BTI-MNT
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE