ACNG

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	8
All fragments	16 blocks across 6 clusters
Cluster ID	209902947
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON

8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05

2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
78.5.2.108/30	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
78.6.227.152/29	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
78.6.227.240/29	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.20.253.52/30	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
89.118.249.32/29	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
213.255.90.104/29	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
217.221.111.64/26	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
217.221.111.128/26	ACNG	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “ACNG” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

ACNG-GPON 4 blocks
ACNG-NAT 1 blocks
ACNG-COMMERCIAL 1 blocks
ACNG-ETH 1 blocks
ACNG-ROOT 1 blocks

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

ACNG-NAT via AC Systemy Sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
ACNG-COMMERCIAL via AC Systemy Sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
ACNG-ETH via AC Systemy Sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
ACNG-ROOT via AC Systemy Sp. z o.o. sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ALBACOM-MNT BTI-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE